6 Comments
Aug 25, 2023Liked by William M. Peaster

well done!

Expand full comment

By definition these are not free mints at all. But 0.000777 Eth mints. I'd rather use a real free mint or charge directly a smaller amount on other really free mint platform.

Expand full comment
author

With all due respect, this is nitpicking semantics. A creator can do a paid mint, e.g. .01 ETH per. But you literally input "0" in for the primary sale price here, which is where the practical "free mint" naming comes from. As a nft collector for years I also have zero problem paying the small collector fee, especially with how it's divvied out. It's a win-win-win situation imo.

Expand full comment

IHMO, if the buyer always pays 0.000777, it is not free minting.

A free minting platform with a set 0.000444 fee would be better both for the collector and the collection owner.

The collector pays less, and the owner earns more. I guess we both agree on this, right?

Expand full comment
author
Aug 25, 2023·edited Aug 25, 2023Author

No we don't agree, you're brigading. The creator here used to have to pay a one-time deployment fee, that has been dropped to zero. And the creator puts the mint price in as "0" for the primary sale, hence the practical free mint naming. No one's obfuscating that collector's pay a very small fee here, one that personally I'm more than happy to pay for any mint I enjoy

Expand full comment

I'm just comparing with other platforms that charge in a different way and have real free minting.

I see that we don't agree. It's OK.

Expand full comment