Metaversal is a Bankless newsletter for weekly level-ups on NFTs and the onchain frontier
Dear Bankless Nation,
NFTs have an image problem in the mainstream.
One reason? Many people think NFTs are bad for the environment.ย
The reality is that most NFT activity today happens atop proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchains like Ethereum, Polygon, and Solana, which use remarkably little energy.ย
For todayโs post, letโs dive into some energy estimates here and use that as a springboard to discuss the bigger picture!
-WMP
๐ฎย Thanks to Kraken NFT ๐ฎ
๐ ย Kraken NFT is built for secure NFT trading โจ
The New Era of Green NFTs
One of the biggest outstanding misconceptions about NFTs is that they require excessive amounts of energy.
This is a holdover from the 2021 NFT bull run, when Ethereum still ran on proof-of-work (PoW) mining. PoW was used to bootstrap Ethereum, and the physicality of mining operations is energy-intensive, but the plan all along was for Ethereum to dephysicalize by switching to PoS, i.e. ditch physical miners in favor of digital validators.ย
That plan was put into action in September 2022 via The Merge update, which officially shifted Ethereum to PoS. The energy savings were immediate and immense.ย
Indeed, according to a 2022 report by the Crypto Carbon Ratings Institute (CCRI), The Merge slashed Ethereumโs yearly energy consumption by +99.9% and its annual carbon footprint by +99.9%, making the network a decidedly green blockchain.ย
Additionally, a newer October 2023 report by CCRI examined the energy stats of seven PoS chains, namely Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos, Avalanche, Algorand, Cardano, and Polkadot.ย
Of these projects, the study found the least-consuming network was Polkadot, which matched the average annual energy consumption of ~15 U.S. households, while the most-consuming was Ethereum, which equaled the usage of ~542 U.S. households.ย
Equally modest were these networksโ carbon footprints, which CCRIโs 2023 report found ranged from Polkadotโs 70.8 tonnes of annual carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to Ethereumโs 2,088.4 tonnes.
Bankless Citizens who completed the Jito quest in our Airdrop Hunter tool just earned $15k or more ๐น
Don't miss the next one ๐
Altogether, then, these seven PoS chains notched around 4,935 tonnes of CO2 emissions in 2023. To give you a sense of scale here, a recent Our World in Data report estimated that the entire world emitted more than 34 billion tonnes of CO2 in 2022. That means the most popular PoS chains in crypto currently account for somewhere around 0.000014% of global emissions!ย
All that said, currently one of the most popular use cases for blockchains is NFTs, and most NFT activity today occurs on PoS chains. The reality is that the energy footprint of the contemporary NFT ecosystem is minuscule, and it pales in comparison to emissions from things like the mainstream gaming industry or the operations of global data centers.ย
Of course, in combination with these base PoS networks, the advent of Layer 2 (L2) scaling solutions atop chains like Ethereum means the cryptoeconomy is well-positioned to accommodate increasing amounts of extremely energy-efficient financial activity (DeFi) and cultural activity (NFTs) going forward.ย
This is why the โNFTs are killing the environmentโ chatter in the mainstream is so absurd, as the opposite is true. PoS infra + NFTs should be championed as a green alternative to physical collectibles, physical merch, etc. because they are a green alternative!ย
Imagine if every big touring band and every big sports team in the world replaced 10% of their physical merch offerings with digital merch via NFTsโthat switch alone would lead to tremendous savings in annual CO2 emissions thanks to the cuts in manufacturing and shipping operations. Itโs just the truth, whether naysayers want to accept it or not.ย
Here, Iโm reminded of the Optimism L2โs We โค๏ธ The Art contest, which just fielded +7,000 NFT submissions. It didnโt entail 1,000s of artists shipping in physical canvas submissions from around the world, a process that wouldโve drawn a huge carbon footprint. It happened with digital mints ultimately atop Ethereum, a network with the same annual energy consumption as a small town with a population of 1,000-1,500 people.
Itโs not that everything physical has to or should be digitized as an NFT, but letโs be clear, among their other benefits PoS NFTs offer a green, environmentally friendly way to engage in 21st-century culturemaking, and thatโs something that should be celebrated.ย ย
However, there has been a revival in Bitcoin NFTs since the arrival of the Ordinals tokenization method last year, and these NFTs are underpinned by PoW mining. Ordinals are technically compelling and offer a great cost-to-permanence ratio, but their energy footprint is unquestionably many multiples higher than PoS NFTs because of the extensive physicality of Bitcoin mining operations.ย
I suspect, and personally wish, that Bitcoin will eventually make the shift to PoS. In the meantime, Bitcoin may give ammunition to NFT critics, but that shouldnโt stop us from trumpeting the extreme energy efficiency of PoS NFTs in contrast and pushing back against blanket mischaracterizations of all NFTs as energy-intensive!
Action steps:
๐ณ Read CCRIโs 2023 PoS report: The PoS Benchmark Study
๐ฅ Catch up on my previous write-up: Return of Ronin
๐ Collect this post: Mint it on Mirror
Author bio
William M. Peaster is the creator of Metaversalโa Bankless newsletter focused on the emergence of NFTs in the cryptoeconomy. He also serves as a senior writer for the main Bankless newsletter.
๐ Together with ๐ฎ Kraken NFT ๐ฎ
KRAKEN NFT
Kraken NFT is one of the most secure, easy-to-use and dynamic marketplaces available. Active and new collectors alike benefit from zero gas fees, multi-chain access, payment flexibility with fiat or 200+ cryptocurrencies, and built-in rarity rankings. Learn more at Kraken.com/nft
๐ Visit Kraken.com to learn more and open an account today.
Not financial or tax advice.ย This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. This newsletter is not tax advice. Talk to your accountant. Do your own research.
Disclosure.ย From time-to-time I may add links in this newsletter to products I use. I may receive commission if you make a purchase through one of these links. Additionally, the Bankless writers hold crypto assets. See ourย investment disclosures here.